dGENdGEN Visual Studio
Sign inJoin the waitlist
← All comparisons

COMPARE

Nano Banana Pro vs GPT Image 2.5

Both set text well. Pick GPT Image 2.5 for a long, precise brief it reads to the end. Pick Nano Banana Pro for a cast that stays the same and edits that behave like a camera.

A gallery wall with a printed poster that reads OPENING NIGHT in clean type.
Made with Nano Banana Pro in this studio.
A hand-drawn style infographic of a coffee brewing process, with readable labels.
Made with GPT Image 2.5 in this studio.

Side by side

Nano Banana ProGPT Image 2.5
Made byGoogle DeepMindOpenAI
Best forPosters, packaging and ads where the text has to be rightLong, precise briefs and text you do not have to fix
Price here, fromEditing 600 cr · Image 600 crEditing 240 cr · Image 240 cr
Strong atText that survives a client review · A cast that stays the same · Editing that behaves like a camera · It knows what things areText you do not have to fix · It reads the whole brief · Change one thing, leave the rest · Large and flexible output
Variants in the studio24

Prices are in credits at the default settings, worked out the same way as the button in the studio. Every run shows its own price before you press it.

Which one to pick

A long brief with many details: GPT Image 2.5GPT Image 2.5 reads the whole brief.
The same cast across images: Nano Banana ProNano Banana Pro keeps a cast the same, anchored with references.
Text you do not want to fix: EitherBoth are among the strongest here for readable text.
Large or unusual sizes: GPT Image 2.5GPT Image 2.5 takes flexible sizes, in multiples of 16 within its pixel limits.

Where each falls short

Nano Banana Pro

  • Google names the limits itself: small faces, accurate spelling and fine detail are where visual and text fidelity slip.
  • Its real-world knowledge is "extensive but not infallible", particularly for anything data-driven, do not treat a generated chart as a source.
  • Advanced edits such as masked editing or a major lighting change can come out looking unnatural.

GPT Image 2.5

  • Dimensions must be multiples of 16 on both edges, and total pixels have to land between 655,360 and 8,294,400. The Studio only offers sizes that satisfy that, so you will not run into it, but it is why the size list is what it is.
  • The quality setting changes both the reasoning depth and the price, and the difference is not small. It is worth choosing deliberately rather than leaving it.
  • The two highest quality settings are not offered in the Studio yet: the provider publishes no price for them.

Questions

Is GPT Image the model inside ChatGPT?

GPT Image 2.5 is OpenAI's image model. Here you run it directly with its settings, priced per image, next to the other models.

Why does the GPT Image price change so much?

Its quality setting changes both the reasoning depth and the price, and the difference is not small. The studio shows it before you run.

Which edits better?

Both change one thing and leave the rest. Nano Banana Pro is the one to pick for edits that move the camera or the light like a photographer would.

Read on

All about Nano Banana ProStudio-grade images with text that actually reads, up to 4K.All about GPT Image 2.5Near-perfect text in images, and it follows a long brief.Run both on the same inputRun one prompt and one source image through six AI image models at once and compare the results side by side. Pick the model that fits your style and budget.Nano Banana Pro vs FLUX.2: AI image models comparedNano Banana Pro vs Nano Banana 2: which to useSeedream 5 vs Nano Banana Pro: layouts and textIdeogram vs GPT Image: AI images with readable text

Try Nano Banana Pro and GPT Image 2.5 side by side

The studio opens in stages. We open access in the order people signed up, and you start with 1,000 free credits.

Get early access